🔗 Share this article

"Half of my personal history is stored on Snapchat, and unexpectedly they demand us to fork out money for it."

Poor reviews and a feeling of inequity have dominated online discussion since Snapchat joined the latest digital platform to put a price tag on a function that people previously utilized for at no cost.

The company behind Snapchat declared in September that it would start charging people if they have exceeding five gigabytes worth of previously shared images and recordings stored as the Memories feature.

In the eyes of countless individuals, these retro posts serve as a glimpse into earlier times – prompting some to blast the firm of "profit-driven motives" in posts on social media and poor feedback on digital storefronts.

Other Choices

Snap has likened its premium storage tiers to those offered by tech giants for mobile devices.

And as an alternative for users unwilling to subscribe, members have the ability to export their saved content – which for many people cover tens of gigabytes – to their own hardware.

Snap stated that only a small number of users would be influenced by the updated terms.

The company admitted that it was "inherently difficult to transition from accessing content at no charge to subscribing to it" – but proposed it would be "justified by the benefits" for users.

A significant number of criticising the decision on the internet clearly oppose this view.

Widespread Discontent

A web-based protest labeled the cost a "archival levy", with users labeling it "Orwellian" and "ridiculous" – while one person vowed never to use the application in the future.

Meanwhile, in a negative review on the digital platform, a person identifying as Natacha Jonsson said it felt "very unethical".

"Based on my understanding of millennials, the majority have a long history of personal moments on the platform," they wrote. "The vast majority only remained on the platform mainly for this purpose. Five gigabytes is insufficient when you have a long timeline of moments... Goodbye to the app."

Furthermore, a London-based user, a 20-year-old journalism student in a major city, revealed on TikTok her intention to remove the app.

"I decided that I needed to download all my saved content as quickly as possible," she explained. "Nearly every part of my youth have been documented through my Snapchat memories, all of the pictures in there are really important to me."

"It just doesn't make sense to introduce fees people for a feature that has been free for so many years."

Unspecified Pricing

The platform has yet to announce how much storage plans would cost in the UK – only that they are part of a "gradual global rollout".

But a young adult another user, who also lives in the city, said in a post on the social platform that she would be "devastated" by the new costs.

She mentioned that the app had become "integrated into daily routine" since she started using it in 2014.

Although she acknowledged she accepted the app needed to make money, the user suggested that the saved content option means more to users than the firm may have realized.

"Personally, I believe it's quite an unfair move to charge your customers who have been faithful and dedicated," she commented. "These aren't just called Memories, these are our actual memories."

Industry Perspective

Firms opting to impose fees from subscribers for a function that was once complimentary is a frequent occurrence, and countless individuals pay for services like iCloud and Google Drive to save their images and clips from their smartphone.

The reality of storing data in the cloud – which certain experts in the technology sector like to refer to as merely "an external server" – is that it requires funding.

"Managing vast amounts of Memories on the platform isn't a trivial amount," online expert a tech commentator stated. "The company has to seek out a approach to fund the operation of archiving, network usage, duplicates, content delivery, data protection – everything involved."

But the consultant indicated that introducing fees for a function that had previously been free, and members had been prompted to utilize as such, may feel like a "bait and switch" for many people.

"Moving the goalposts after users have created this extensive stored content feels inappropriate," he explained. And for many, he added, "Saved content is more than stored files, they're emotional artefacts."

The feeling was shared by those submitting critical reviews, with an individual labeling their Snapchat photos and videos "extremely valuable to me".

"The stored media includes every aspect of my life within them from happy occasions such as new additions, sad moments of loss, memories with friends/family, [and] my entire youth," they wrote.

Research Perspective

A postdoctoral researcher, a research fellow at an educational establishment in the the Low Countries, said that Snapchat's move highlights the ramifications of commercial platforms being used to store meaningful individual recordings.

"They benefit from this trust, connected relationship, and presumption of never-ending access, which even motivates some users to remain with the platform or persist with the feature in order to revisit their saved content," she told the BBC. "But these are not altruistic protectors of individual recollection."