🔗 Share this article

Tbecame clear the manager was able to withstand a loss to Grimsby. Survive losing a crucial continental showpiece against a particularly poor Spurs sides in living memory. He could survive losing at home to West Ham and Wolves, finishing 15th, the tactical inflexibility, squandering some of the club’s best homegrown talent, the 32% win rate, calling his team the poorest the club has ever seen. But there was a single opponent with whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to engage. You come at the sporting director, you had better succeed.

Regrettably, like many a Premiership right-back during Blackburn Rovers' championship campaign, the coach came at Jason Wilcox and seems to have missed. Even the most casual observer can see the irony here: a manager who frequently berated at his players for losing individual battles succumbing when confronted by the white heat and animal charisma of one of England's top division's most intimidating football executives.

And frankly, this entire bruising episode appears to portray Jason Wilcox in a whole new light. It may have been easy, based on his brief stint of experience at Southampton, to regard him as little more than a functionary within the club's structure: an individual who owed his position as much to his friendship with his former boss Omar Berrada as any demonstrable skill. How mistaken we all were. In brilliantly outsmarting United’s feted manager, just as he bested the hapless a previous executive earlier, Jason Wilcox has demonstrated to be among the sport’s true generals: a strategic mind that the club's mid-table rivals are now rightly wary.

The Tactical Conflict Over System and Philosophy

For example, this was the director who having been part of the leadership that hired the rigid 3-4-3 advocate Amorim originally, played a key role in attempting to convince Amorim to ditch his beloved 3-4-3. Naturally, these entreaties were resisted. But perhaps these judgements hold greater authority when issued from the mouth with the unimpeachable soccer background he possesses, a veteran of three England caps and a contributor to a title-winning side decades past.

Maybe eventually he may be persuaded to outline his reasoning to the rest of us. Maybe one day questions may arise regarding why the coach is departing with a full payout, with no penalty clause activated. The director seldom speaks in public, and with very good reason. The real thinkers in football – men like Jason Wilcox – function at a level beyond our own mundane comprehension. Were he to speak, probably we would perceive is a series of ultrasonic blips and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not the same as being prepared to comprehend it.

The Supreme Power Behind the Throne

Naturally, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we overlook the true genius behind the club's current leadership. The director is, after all, merely executing the directives of his ultimate superior Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who privately has emphasized his desire for a back four. According to reports, the owner has also proposed deploying the forward as a right wing-back. The owner is eager for the club to embrace analytics and metrics. Per reports, during a leadership summit early in his investment, he announced that the team's approach to football “will be decided in this room”.

After all, Sir Jim is an expert in these intricate football matters, drawing from his previous experience in petrochemicals and sailing. Most importantly he remains incredibly rich, and it is known, the rich are superior: more perceptive, more wise, more tactically astute, fundamentally better. Who else would you trust to manage a strategic plan of austerity, the building of a new stadium that looks similar to someone’s leftover knitting, the acquisition of a new striker?

A Modern Soccer Hierarchy: Directors Over Managers

This represents a shift we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels of the game. Historically, clubs foolishly delegated major sporting choices to subordinate staff such as coaches, scouts – players themselves. Maybe previously possible for an up-and-coming, innovative manager with ideas and drive to go into a club and see their vision supported to fruition. But how many companies have such individuals set up? What number of large-scale layoffs have they managed? Far preferable to place genuine authority where it rightly belongs: the leadership tier, the casually dressed executives, the guys with impressive LinkedIn profiles. Better by far to determine the strategy in the boardroom and appoint someone who can tailor their methods accordingly. If managers were once chefs, they are now more like Deliveroo drivers: not responsible for the product, but still ultimately answerable if it arrives cold or fails to meet standards.

Nowadays, a coach's role has become not about crafting the philosophy and more about selling it: the receptionist of the operation, the visible figurehead for a club they can do little to influence. Enzo Maresca leads a team of literal children into Europe and wins two medium-sized trophies, and essentially is dismissed for speaking out. A manager at Celtic sees his reputation ruined while those individuals who appointed him live to blunder indefinitely.

A Modern Corporate Game: Accountability for the Few

And possibly on some microcosmic level this is simply neoliberalism in action: the rise of a gilded overclass who can never be wrong, whose decisions are always untouchable, whose errors can invariably be sacked away without explanation. Appoint the 3-4-3 coach only to fire him for using too much 3-4-3. Bring in the project manager and then discard them for requiring excessive time. And most importantly be grateful; for your modest season ticket price rises, for your new player acquisitions, for the fact that the adults – however well qualified – remain in control.