🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. In-network. Out-of-network. Premium health services. Personal healthcare costs. Fixed payment. Co-insurance. Insurance consultants. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. ACA. HMO. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. Point of Service. High Deductible Health Plan. Health Savings Account. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. EOB. COBRA. SHOP. Single coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Confused? It's understandable. Who understands this complex system? Not the typical business owner. Nor the typical employee. Selecting the right healthcare insurance for companies – or for households – appears to require demands advanced expertise in medical insurance.

Our Medical System Is More Than Complicated, It's Expensive

Based on recent research, the average family spends $twenty-seven thousand each year for their health insurance (increasing by 6% compared to last year). The average company healthcare expense is projected to surpass $seventeen thousand for each worker in 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Currently the government has ceased functioning due to partisan disputes regarding tax credits which analysts predict could cause a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.

When Will We Truly Examine National Health Insurance?

How soon might we seriously consider universal healthcare coverage in the United States? I have to believe we're approaching that point because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm proposing for our current Medicare system – an insurance system – merely extend to cover everyone. Our infrastructure doesn't change. The way medical professionals receive payment would change. Trust me, they'll adapt.

The Way Universal Coverage Would Work

Universal healthcare coverage would require payments from both employees and employers. In comparable systems, an employee earning moderate income pays approximately 5.3% to their healthcare. Their employer pays approximately 13.75%.

Does this appear like a lot? Not if you contrast it to what the typical US resident spends. I can name multiple businesses that are routinely paying anywhere from eight to fifteen percent of their employee wages to their healthcare costs. And keep in mind that in inclusive programs, these contributions include pension plans, sick pay, parental benefits and unemployment benefits along with funding medical services. When you add these expenses compared with what we pay on retirement programs, job loss coverage and paid time off, the difference decreases.

Implementation for America

In the US, a national health premium would raise our Medicare tax deduction, a system already established. It should be income-adjusted – those at higher income levels would pay more than those earning less. This includes both worker and company payments. And, like many our government's defense, IT, welfare services and transportation services, the system could be managed to third-party administrators instead of a government office.

Benefits for Small Businesses

A national health insurance program would be a huge benefit for entrepreneurs such as my company. It would place small companies in equal competition with our larger competitors who can afford superior coverage. It would make administration much easier (automatic payroll withholding remitted like retirement and Medicare taxes, rather than individual transactions to benefit firms and insurance providers).

It would make it easier to plan expenses our yearly costs, rather than enduring the complex (and fruitless) process of negotiating with major insurers that we must do each year. Due to simplification, there would exist a better understanding about benefits by our employees – as opposed to the current system where they have to interpret the complexities of current options. Additionally there would definitely exist less liability for employers since we wouldn't have access to workers' health histories for weighing risks and alternative plans.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as pro-market as they get. However I recognize that public institutions has a significant role in our lives, from providing defense to funding needed infrastructure. Ensuring medical coverage to all through a national insurance system enhances economic foundations. It represents superior, simpler approach for small businesses that employ more than half of American employees and generate half of our GDP. It enables employees to be healthier, have better attendance and increase productivity.

Considering Challenges

Are there numerous factors I haven't covered? Of course there are. Given all the healthcare cost increases we've seen recently, it's clear that current healthcare legislation is not working effectively. And I realize that America isn't a small, Scandinavian country where major reforms are easier to implement. But expanding Medicare for all, even with the additional taxes that would be incurred, would still be a better and more affordable approach both for managing medical expenses and ensuring coverage to everyone.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

We as Americans, we need to tone down our own arrogance. America's medical care isn't so great. We rank significantly behind many other countries in healthcare quality globally, based on major studies. Maybe one bright spot amid current situation is that we take a hard look in the mirror and acknowledge that major reforms need to happen.